Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 6

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 6   Introduction Earlier we concluded that the words settlement and entrance imply that the mitzvah is obligatory only in Israel. But there are mitzvoth, such as Shabbat, that use these words and yet are still obligatory...

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 5

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 5   Introduction This section deals with R. Yishmael s understanding of the phrases used in the Torah for entering and settling the land. Do they always mean that the mitzvah is obligatory only in the land? For ease of reference,...

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 4

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 4   Introduction In yesterday s section, the Talmud debated the relationship between R. Elazar and the tanna kamma was R. Elazar more lenient or stringent vis a vis the prohibition of new produce outside the land of Israel. Today...

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 3

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 3   Introduction Today s section begins to discuss the relationship between R. Elazar and the first opinion in the mishnah is R. Elazar more stringent or more lenient? For convenience sake I reproduce here the mishnah.  ...

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 2

Kiddushin, Daf Lammed Zayin, Part 2   Introduction The Talmud now asks how we know the rule that mitzvoth dependent on land (soil) are obligatory in the land of Israel and those not dependent on land are obligatory everywhere. The section expounds on Deuteronomy...